how to increase node b capacity?

[_lisi4king]

i have found the parameter :
TYPRABBASIC in RNC Parameter

you can use LST TYPRAB,
change/delete RABINDEX which has MAXBITRATE=384000 (if you want to delete PS384)

Thanks

And this is RNC Parametr. I don't know in which cases somebody will use it

[arisondang]

It not a sollution for me. In our counrty 3 UMTS operator, and if will decrease throughput, subsrubers will move to another operator. It is better to decrease number of users (tilt, CIPICH power), but for the rest - provide good service!

Hahaha..

If you Decrease CPICH and tilt,
It will reduce number of user, shrink coverage and killing the access for user..
Your customer will complain due to coverage issue..

If you are disable PS384 or PS256,
you are not killing the user access, but just limit the max rate and giving space for another user (not rejected or killing the access), and then
If HSDPA is enable in that cell and HSPA user is higher than R99 user,
you can expand your HSDPA Code and it will improve HSDPA user experience..

Please to check PS Distribution, PS64DL:PS128DL:PS256DL:PS384DL
I guess PS384 seizure (duration time) is lower than PS64 Kbps..
If it is true, no worries to disable that RAB

But the choice is yours..


Thanks

[arisondang]

And this is RNC Parametr. I don't know in which cases somebody will use it

If your PS384 distribution in 1 RNC is very low compared than other PS RAB
In my country, most of 3G Handset is HSDPA Capable UE..
so, why we have to give them 384 rather than move them to HSDPA?

Thanks

[_lisi4king]

If your PS384 distribution in 1 RNC is very low compared than other PS RAB
In my country, most of 3G Handset is HSDPA Capable UE..
so, why we have to give them 384 rather than move them to HSDPA?

Thanks

May be it is a good reason. Need to investigate.

[arisondang]

May be it is a good reason. Need to investigate.

yes.. correct.. snapshot ur network first..
i am waiting the result

Thanks

[agenov]

[QUOTE=arisondang;136267]If your PS384 distribution in 1 RNC is very low compared than other PS RAB
In my country, most of 3G Handset is HSDPA Capable UE..
so, why we have to give them 384 rather than move them to HSDPA?



did you really remove this RAB in your RNC?

BR
Alex

[arisondang]

[QUOTE=agenov;136304]

If your PS384 distribution in 1 RNC is very low compared than other PS RAB
In my country, most of 3G Handset is HSDPA Capable UE..
so, why we have to give them 384 rather than move them to HSDPA?



did you really remove this RAB in your RNC?

BR
Alex

Last year we did this solution when we had many congestion in Power/Code/CE due to some big event happening.
Now we dont have capacity issue, and most of them have 2nd Carrier already

Thanks

[agenov]

[QUOTE=arisondang;136368]

Last year we did this solution when we had many congestion in Power/Code/CE due to some big event happening.
Now we dont have capacity issue, and most of them have 2nd Carrier already

Thanks

ok. To be honest this is more or less some solution even to be robust one. But HUawei already provide solution for that and is called load algorithms, so u may activated with the same success LDR for example to offload your cell....

BR

[adewijaya]

[QUOTE=agenov;136499]

ok. To be honest this is more or less some solution even to be robust one. But HUawei already provide solution for that and is called load algorithms, so u may activated with the same success LDR for example to offload your cell....

BR

for LDR case its just "tricky" parameter, some cases will be solved but anothers were open, i think better using Arisondang ways to make it all happy

[agenov]

[QUOTE=adewijaya;136523]

for LDR case its just "tricky" parameter, some cases will be solved but anothers were open, i think better using Arisondang ways to make it all happy

What case will be not?