Thanks Thanks:  2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Showing results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: RTN 380H eband product evaluation

  1. #11
    Member Reputation: 18
    Join Date
    2011-07-13
    Posts
    3

    Default Re: RTN 380H eband product evaluation

    My guesswork is that HUA, ERSS, SIAE go with BCOM SoC not sure about NEC.

    But we need to consider possible change of strategy if BCOM SoC cannot deliver according to specs

  2. #12
    Moderator Reputation: 153
    Join Date
    2011-05-10
    Posts
    364

    Default Re: RTN 380H eband product evaluation

    the WIN position (maybe i have already said) is the position of the producers that are able not only to integrated a 3 part SOC but also to capability to design (in parallel ) his own system.
    They benfit of a fast time to market but also to have a recovery path in case the "chain" is broken...
    and also to have a better negotiazion position vs providers for prices

    what about Intracom Mdal21, do you know what they are using?




    Quote Originally Posted by mdal21 View Post
    My guesswork is that HUA, ERSS, SIAE go with BCOM SoC not sure about NEC.

    But we need to consider possible change of strategy if BCOM SoC cannot deliver according to specs
    Last edited by simog72; 2016-06-25 at 12:52 AM
    **** COMMODORE 64 BASIC V2 ****
    64K RAM SYSTEM 38911 BASIC BYTES FREE
    READY.

  3. #13
    Member Reputation: 18
    Join Date
    2011-07-13
    Posts
    3

    Default Re: RTN 380H eband product evaluation

    Simog72 indeed the correct strategy for a vendor that has no internal solution (expertise) is to buy from the Market until when (and if) comes up with his own solution. A vendor that has available its own solution is always better off in any negotiation of that kind.

    Let me complete me contribution concerning vendors, Intracom its own solution, Siklu its own solution as I think for NEC (as stated above). So in my score-board we have a tie!

  4. #14
    Moderator Reputation: 153
    Join Date
    2011-05-10
    Posts
    364

    Default Re: RTN 380H eband product evaluation

    agree on Siklu (recently launched ETH2500 series) , disagree on NEC ..but only my opinion

    disagree on strategy

    anyway it was my fault , i reported "WIN Position is.." giving a generic judgement instead clarify that is a personal opinion
    case by case could be different
    so i understand yuor point, thank you to give me opportunity to better clarify and correct
    Last edited by simog72; 2016-06-28 at 05:30 PM
    **** COMMODORE 64 BASIC V2 ****
    64K RAM SYSTEM 38911 BASIC BYTES FREE
    READY.

  5. #15
    Member Reputation: 261
    Join Date
    2009-01-17
    Location
    here and there
    Posts
    344

    Default Re: RTN 380H eband product evaluation

    Hi,

    Quote Originally Posted by rm77 View Post
    hi ;
    i want to add this feature which i think it's interesting:
    AMAC:Adaptive modulation and adaptive channel space (AMAC) is a technology that automatically adjusts the working mode based on channel quality. AMAC includes the AM and AC functions.
    please refer to the joined doc for more details about this features
    Can you please share the full Product Description of the Huawei E-Band RTN380, please?

    Thx

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •