My guesswork is that HUA, ERSS, SIAE go with BCOM SoC not sure about NEC.
But we need to consider possible change of strategy if BCOM SoC cannot deliver according to specs
My guesswork is that HUA, ERSS, SIAE go with BCOM SoC not sure about NEC.
But we need to consider possible change of strategy if BCOM SoC cannot deliver according to specs
the WIN position (maybe i have already said) is the position of the producers that are able not only to integrated a 3 part SOC but also to capability to design (in parallel ) his own system.
They benfit of a fast time to market but also to have a recovery path in case the "chain" is broken...
and also to have a better negotiazion position vs providers for prices
what about Intracom Mdal21, do you know what they are using?
Last edited by simog72; 2016-06-25 at 12:52 AM
**** COMMODORE 64 BASIC V2 ****
64K RAM SYSTEM 38911 BASIC BYTES FREE
READY.
Simog72 indeed the correct strategy for a vendor that has no internal solution (expertise) is to buy from the Market until when (and if) comes up with his own solution. A vendor that has available its own solution is always better off in any negotiation of that kind.
Let me complete me contribution concerning vendors, Intracom its own solution, Siklu its own solution as I think for NEC (as stated above). So in my score-board we have a tie!
agree on Siklu (recently launched ETH2500 series) , disagree on NEC ..but only my opinion
disagree on strategy
anyway it was my fault , i reported "WIN Position is.." giving a generic judgement instead clarify that is a personal opinion
case by case could be different
so i understand yuor point, thank you to give me opportunity to better clarify and correct
Last edited by simog72; 2016-06-28 at 05:30 PM
**** COMMODORE 64 BASIC V2 ****
64K RAM SYSTEM 38911 BASIC BYTES FREE
READY.
Bookmarks