Thanks Thanks:  1
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Showing results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: data throughput measurement on application layer

  1. #1
    VIP Member Reputation: 1171
    Join Date
    2008-10-24
    Posts
    660


    Default data throughput measurement on application layer

    Hello,
    I would like to open a new subject , surely interested for all of us > data throughput measurements on application layer.

    Please, share which SW tools and methods you use to measure 2G/3G data throughput measurements , and respond time of your networks ... could someone share some report and some advices and know how about measuring while making http, wap, email, DL UL ftp, ping ... ?

    Lets share ...
    P

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #2
    Member Reputation: 43
    Join Date
    2008-12-07
    Posts
    171


    Default need hassen's response..

    Very Good Topic....

    The VIP Members should response.....
    I mean the super engineer...Hassen...

    Hopefully Hassen is the right person for this topic..

    thanks

  4. #3
    VIP Member Reputation: 1849 wolverine's Avatar
    Join Date
    2009-01-16
    Posts
    835


    Default

    I use the following tools in my company..

    For application layer throughput monitoring..

    Netpersec & DU meter

    For latency measurements..

    ping command from the DOS prompt & Perfping

    For throughput measurements using UDP there is a very good utility called UDP flood that you can run on a test server hanging off your GGSN. This way you can measure throughput with worrying about TCP peculiarities..

  5. #4
    Member Reputation: 83
    Join Date
    2008-09-11
    Location
    Telecomunication
    Posts
    121


    Default

    ethereal is the usefull one

  6. #5
    VIP Member Reputation: 571
    Join Date
    2008-06-01
    Posts
    1,078


    Default

    we use business objects for gprs statistical according to counters and formula
    ping to know time responce
    The use of WAP to access the various servers of the operators
    create a session at SGSN and from drive test make downloading in order to measure
    throughput
    .

  7. #6
    VIP Member Reputation: 1171
    Join Date
    2008-10-24
    Posts
    660


    Default different PING volume of bytes ?

    Thanks Hassen and all

    @all
    Do you use only ping volume of the data 32 bytes ... to be assured that you have information how customer see response of your network ... or , you have done pinging with bigger then 32 bytes of volume of data sent by this command ... maybe, to be closer to simulate some service access , like http ? Logically I think, we should discard first PING result in making precise statistics of consecutive PINGs, as at start TBF takes time to establish ... and we are looking for average of all resuts made by some sequence (except that first longer one ... ) Do you agree ?

  8. #7
    VIP Member Reputation: 1849 wolverine's Avatar
    Join Date
    2009-01-16
    Posts
    835


    Default

    I would suggest varying the ping size in order to uncover any potential bottlenecks you might have. Perfping has a nice interface that allows you to do that and will also start off with a small ping packet and keep increasing it.

  9. #8
    VIP Member Reputation: 1171
    Join Date
    2008-10-24
    Posts
    660


    Default PING size range

    Thanks M
    what is range of ping size/volume you set in Perfping ... from minimum xx bytes , to how mucho Max yy bytes ? Can you share with us install of these nice tools ? Correct me if I am wrong , but I am not sure they were offered by someone before ... If is not a hassle to you ... we know how to return smile and thanks ...

    Also, here is link to many SW tools from the similar family of tools, like Perfping ... useful, scroll down ..
    http://3d2f.com/pcgi/search.cgi?s=23737&t=2&w=2
    P
    Last edited by punto; 2009-02-23 at 09:40 PM Reason: adding weblink

  10. #9
    Member Reputation: 171
    Join Date
    2009-01-01
    Posts
    162


    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hassen View Post
    we use business objects for gprs statistical according to counters and formula
    ping to know time responce
    The use of WAP to access the various servers of the operators
    create a session at SGSN and from drive test make downloading in order to measure
    throughput
    .
    Actually Zte BSC use rollcall polling way to process ping test packets which is different from traffic packet. And the way increases the ping packets' delay..

    "Because ping is only one test tool with which we test the link connected or not, so we use rollcall
    polling way. With rollcall polling way, we can decrease the ping packets’ processing load and the
    influence of normal traffic packets.
    However we do not the rollcall polling way to process traffic packets. In one word, the delay of ping
    packets does not mean that the true delay of traffic packets."
    Last edited by da_manole; 2009-03-04 at 06:22 AM

  11. #10
    Senior Member Reputation: 502
    Join Date
    2008-11-05
    Posts
    1,025


    Default

    Any one can help me what is the acceptable RTT(latency) for both GPRS and EDGE .

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •