Thanks Thanks:  0
Showing results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: GSM TCH expansion

  1. #1
    Junior Member Reputation: 10
    Join Date
    2010-12-14
    Posts
    18


    Default GSM TCH expansion

    Hi,

    I was wondering if there is a way to approximate the required number of TCH on a cell knowing the current traffic, congestion level and available TCH. I was thinking about using the erlang B formula using the congestion % and the number of configured channels to determine the offered traffic and then use the erlang formula again to calculate the required TCH to serve that offered traffic with a 2% GoS. Is this the right way to do this? I'm getting extremely high TCH requirements.

    The other option is to consider that the lost-traffic is equal to the percentage of congestion, so, a 50% congestion would mean approximately a 50% increase in traffic.

    How do you decide how many additional TRXs to add?

    Thanks in advance.

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #2
    Member Reputation: 140
    Join Date
    2011-01-03
    Location
    underground
    Posts
    85


    Default Re: GSM TCH expansion

    is ur carried traffic/offered traffic > 100% and also have congestion?

  4. #3
    Junior Member Reputation: 10
    Join Date
    2010-12-14
    Posts
    18


    Default Re: GSM TCH expansion

    Hi Amit.Kumar,

    I'm not sure if I follow what you're saying. I'll give an example of the situation:

    I have a cell with 20 Erl of carried traffic with 13 TCH-FR (26 TCH-HR) and 75% of TCH congestion. How can I determine the number of additional TCH needed to carry all the offered traffic (20 Erl + the lost traffic) with a GoS of 2%?.

    Regards.

  5. #4
    Member Reputation: 140
    Join Date
    2011-01-03
    Location
    underground
    Posts
    85


    Default Re: GSM TCH expansion

    may i ask what is the formula for tch congestion? we use the following huwei counters to determine congestion in a cell and add/remove trx accordingly.sometimes we go for half rate penetration


    TR373:Cell Availability(none)
    K3004:Traffic Volume on SDCCH(Erl)
    K3014:Traffic Volume on TCH(Erl)
    K3034:TCHH Traffic Volume(Erl)
    CR3557:Traffic Volume on TCHs (Underlaid Subcell)(Erl)
    CR3558:Traffic Volume on TCHs (Overlaid Subcell)(Erl)
    K3041:TCH Congestion Rate (Overflow)(none)
    SDCCH Congestion (including reattempt)(%)
    K3016:Configured TCHs(none)
    K3006:Configured SDCCHs(none)
    AR3017A:Mean Number of Dynamically Configured Channels (TCHF) (900/850/810 band)(none)
    AR3017B:Mean Number of Dynamically Configured Channels (TCHF) (1800/1900 Band)(none)
    AR3018A:Mean Number of Dynamically Configured Channels (TCHH) (900/850/810 band)(none)
    AR3018B:Mean Number of Dynamically Configured Channels (TCHH) (1800/1900 Band)(none)
    TCH Congestion(%)
    R3007A:Number of Initially Configured Channels (TCHF) (900/850/810 band)(none)
    R3007B:Number of Initially Configured Channels (TCHF) (1800/1900 Band)(none)
    CR300B:Number of Initially Configured Channels (TCH)(none)


    also for tch congestion we use the following formula. Your TCH congestion seems to be too high

    TCH Congestion ({100}*[CA312:Failed Assignments (Channel Unavailable)])/([CA310:Assignment Requests]+([H3301W:Outgoing External Inter-Cell Handover Requests (Directed Retry) (900/850/810-900/850/810)]+[H3301X:Outgoing External Inter-Cell Handover Requests (Directed Retry) (1800/1900-1800/1900)]+[H3301Y:Outgoing External Inter-Cell Handover Requests (Directed Retry) (900/850/810-1800/1900)]+[H3301Z:Outgoing External Inter-Cell Handover Requests (Directed Retry) (1800/1900-900/850/810)]+[H3101W:Number of Outgoing Internal Inter-Cell Handover Requests (Directed Retry) (900/850/810-900/850/810)]+[H3101X:Number of Outgoing Internal Inter-Cell Handover Requests (Directed Retry) (1800/1900-1800/1900)]+[H3101Y:Number of Outgoing Internal Inter-Cell Handover Requests (Directed Retry) (900/850/810-1800/1900)]+[H3101Z:Number of Outgoing Internal Inter-Cell Handover Requests (Directed Retry) (1800/1900-900/850/810)]))

  6. #5
    Member Reputation: 178
    Join Date
    2010-09-24
    Posts
    89


    Default Re: GSM TCH expansion

    Hi,

    I assume another 15 Erl will solve your congestion problem if I correctly got your point.


    Regards,
    Karim

  7. #6
    Junior Member Reputation: 10
    Join Date
    2010-12-14
    Posts
    18


    Default Re: GSM TCH expansion

    Hi,

    Amit.Kumar, I would have to check the formula on Monday, I'm not really sure right now, but I think is a simpler formula.

    Karim, you agree that the lost traffic is aproximately equal to the congestion level?.

    Thank you both.

    Regards.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •