Thanks Thanks:  11
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Showing results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: FACH and PCH congestion

  1. #1
    Member Reputation: 19
    Join Date
    2012-01-12
    Posts
    16


    Default FACH and PCH congestion

    Dear RF Experts,

    How can I check for the usage and if there is any congestion on the FACH and PCH channels? Recently, we activated the feature Cell_PCH transition and I'd like to know if there is any counter related to them. Would like to ask for your help and guidance on how to optimize these features. Thanks and waiting for your comments.

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #2
    Member Reputation: 19
    Join Date
    2012-01-12
    Posts
    16


    Default Re: FACH and PCH congestion

    By the way, vendor is Huawei...Thanks!

  4. #3
    Member Reputation: 19
    Join Date
    2012-01-12
    Posts
    16


    Default Re: FACH and PCH congestion

    Guys, come on....nobody knows? Seriously? Need you help please...

  5. #4
    Member Reputation: 72
    Join Date
    2010-02-27
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    258


    Default Re: FACH and PCH congestion

    Can Use these formulas to check FACH and PCH Utilization

    FACH Utilization - 100*{VS.CRNCIubBytesFACH.Tx/measurement duration}/ VS.CRNC.IUB.FACH.Bandwidth
    PCH Utilization - 100*{VS.CRNC.IubBytesPCH.tx/measurement duration}/ VS.CRNC.IUB.PCH.Bandwidth

    VS.RRC.Paging1.Loss.PCHCong.Cell shows Paging loss due to PCH congestion, so PCH congestion can be reflected.


    FACH congestion is shown by these counters.
    VS.FACH.DCCH.CONG.TIME - Congestion Duration of DCCHs Carried over FACHs for Cell
    VS.FACH.DTCH.CONG.TIME - Congestion Duration of DTCHs Carried over FACHs for Cell

    Regards, jack.
    Last edited by jayk; 2012-05-16 at 03:08 AM

  6. #5
    Junior Member Reputation: 9
    Join Date
    2012-06-14
    Posts
    3


    0 out of 1 members found this post helpful.

    Default Re: FACH and PCH congestion

    Thanks i am helpfull by this formula

  7. #6
    Junior Member Reputation: 9
    Join Date
    2012-06-12
    Posts
    8


    0 out of 1 members found this post helpful.

    Default Re: FACH and PCH congestion

    Thanks for this formula.

  8. #7
    Member Reputation: 81
    Join Date
    2011-04-28
    Posts
    113


    Default Re: FACH and PCH congestion

    Hi Gurus..

    Do you have similar formula for E*******? W10

  9. #8
    Member Reputation: 54
    Join Date
    2011-12-31
    Posts
    222


    Default Re: FACH and PCH congestion

    A relevant question here, i am really confused as we have introduced URA state. After this lot of FACH involvement is there, what is the theoretical limitation of FACH. I mean how many user can be accomodated and can transmit data simultaneously. I will really appreicate if someone can share practical experience and let us know where we can find in documents. (Alex).

    Do we have counters avaialble in e******* to find out the FACH utilization, congestion.

    BR//
    Imran

  10. #9
    Junior Member Reputation: 10
    Join Date
    2012-02-25
    Posts
    1


    Default Re: FACH and PCH congestion

    thank you .....I am looking for a long time.

  11. #10
    Member Reputation: 22
    Join Date
    2010-02-06
    Posts
    47


    Default Re: FACH and PCH congestion

    I am trying to evaluate the FACH performance as well (E******* W10), but there is no such counter as in Huawei for FACH Congestion Time. However I decided to look at the relevant counters/KPIs for Channel Switching from/to Cell-FACH, as well as the average number of users in Cell Fach:

    pmSumFachPsIntRabEstablish / pmSamplesFachPsIntRabEstablish

    This, considered with the RRC Setup Success Rate would give an indication if we have capacity issues with the FACH.

    I have posted the KPI formulas here: http://www.finetopix.com/showthread.php?31133

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •