Thanks Thanks:  161
Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Showing results 21 to 30 of 114

Thread: Tool for analysis coverage on Google Earth

  1. #21
    Member Reputation: 90
    Join Date
    2011-10-07
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    61


    Default Re: Tool for analysis coverage on Google Earth

    Quote Originally Posted by RF-SYR View Post
    Dear,
    I have problem with legend image, it's not found.

    Please check and advice.
    Please,

    Let me see the problem. Give me a print.

  2. #22
    Member Reputation: 90
    Join Date
    2011-10-07
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    61


    Default Re: Tool for analysis coverage on Google Earth

    Quote Originally Posted by striker View Post
    Hi dab,

    Can you make like this that is compatible for E******* also and Is it possible the base data we can use period for Lat/Long?

    thanks
    Hi,

    Here in my work, we adapt the export data from E******* to Huawei's export. It's simple because TA measures are very similar in both.

    About the Lat/Long, i don't understand you. What you mean ?

    Kindly,

  3. #23
    VIP Member Reputation: 1019
    Join Date
    2009-09-07
    Posts
    1,140


    Default Re: Tool for analysis coverage on Google Earth

    So you mean even the format for E******* is possible? I mean the Lat Long you gave is in comma which is your standard format I think..Is it possible to make is as Period as format

  4. #24
    Member Reputation: 90
    Join Date
    2011-10-07
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    61


    Default Re: Tool for analysis coverage on Google Earth

    Quote Originally Posted by striker View Post
    So you mean even the format for E******* is possible? I mean the Lat Long you gave is in comma which is your standard format I think..Is it possible to make is as Period as format
    - 27,0000 or - 27.0000 hasn't difference into the data base, you can put the both.

    About the format it's very simple, just you adapt the E******* to HW counters.

    Follow the Huawei Counters:

    PS: I believe which in E******* don't have Radio Link Failure, this case put the "0".

    Number of MRs (TA = 0)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 1)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 2)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 3)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 4)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 5)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 6)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 7)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 8)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 9)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 10)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 11)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 12)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 13)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 14)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 15)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 16)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 17)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 18)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 19)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 20)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 21)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 22)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 23)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 24)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 25)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 26)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 27)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 28)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 29)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 30 or 31)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 32 or 33)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 34 or 35)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 36 or 37)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 38 or 39)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 40 to 44)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 45 to 49)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 50 to 54)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 55 to 63)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA greater than 63)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 0)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 1)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 2)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 3)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 4)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 5)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 6)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 7)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 8)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 9)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 10)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 11)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 12)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 13)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 14)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 15)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 16)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 17)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 18)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 19)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 20)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 21)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 22)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 23)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 24)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 25)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 26)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 27)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 28)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 29)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 30 or 31)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 32 or 33)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 34 or 35)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 36 or 37)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 38 or 39)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 40 to 44)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 45 to 49)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 50 to 54)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 55 to 63)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA greater than 63)(times)

  5. #25
    VIP Member Reputation: 1019
    Join Date
    2009-09-07
    Posts
    1,140


    Default Re: Tool for analysis coverage on Google Earth

    Quote Originally Posted by dabreulima View Post
    - 27,0000 or - 27.0000 hasn't difference into the data base, you can put the both.

    About the format it's very simple, just you adapt the E******* to HW counters.

    Follow the Huawei Counters:

    PS: I believe which in E******* don't have Radio Link Failure, this case put the "0".

    Number of MRs (TA = 0)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 1)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 2)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 3)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 4)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 5)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 6)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 7)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 8)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 9)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 10)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 11)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 12)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 13)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 14)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 15)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 16)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 17)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 18)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 19)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 20)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 21)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 22)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 23)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 24)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 25)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 26)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 27)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 28)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 29)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 30 or 31)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 32 or 33)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 34 or 35)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 36 or 37)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 38 or 39)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 40 to 44)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 45 to 49)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 50 to 54)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA = 55 to 63)(times)
    Number of MRs (TA greater than 63)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 0)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 1)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 2)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 3)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 4)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 5)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 6)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 7)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 8)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 9)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 10)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 11)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 12)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 13)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 14)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 15)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 16)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 17)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 18)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 19)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 20)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 21)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 22)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 23)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 24)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 25)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 26)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 27)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 28)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 29)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 30 or 31)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 32 or 33)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 34 or 35)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 36 or 37)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 38 or 39)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 40 to 44)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 45 to 49)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 50 to 54)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA = 55 to 63)(times)
    Radio Link Failures (TA greater than 63)(times)

    okey..but e******* format is different from huawei..E******* uses Horizontal not like huawei it's vertical position so it will take time to do it...

  6. #26
    Member Reputation: 249
    Join Date
    2011-03-13
    Posts
    277


    Default Re: Tool for analysis coverage on Google Earth

    Quote Originally Posted by dabreulima View Post
    Please,

    Let me see the problem. Give me a print.
    Please find in the image my legend problem.

    untitled.jpg

  7. #27
    Member Reputation: 90
    Join Date
    2011-10-07
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    61


    Default Re: Tool for analysis coverage on Google Earth

    Quote Originally Posted by RF-SYR View Post
    Please find in the image my legend problem.

    untitled.jpg
    Make a new test.


    Try reinstall the program and do not change the installation folder.

    teste.jpg

  8. #28
    Member Reputation: 249
    Join Date
    2011-03-13
    Posts
    277


    Default Re: Tool for analysis coverage on Google Earth

    Quote Originally Posted by dabreulima View Post
    Make a new test.


    Try reinstall the program and do not change the installation folder.

    teste.jpg
    Same problem dear.

    An other thing dear, the distance is not true.
    untitled.jpg

  9. #29
    VIP Member Reputation: 1019
    Join Date
    2009-09-07
    Posts
    1,140


    Default Re: Tool for analysis coverage on Google Earth

    Quote Originally Posted by RF-SYR View Post
    Please find in the image my legend problem.

    untitled.jpg
    Me almost the same problem with you..I have the legend but I can't see the beaming of each sector..

  10. #30
    Member Reputation: 90
    Join Date
    2011-10-07
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    61


    Default Re: Tool for analysis coverage on Google Earth

    Quote Originally Posted by RF-SYR View Post
    Same problem dear.

    An other thing dear, the distance is not true.
    untitled.jpg
    About the distance, this happened after the changes on Kml sources from google earth.
    I still do not have time to check the problem that caused this error in the distance.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •