Thanks Thanks:  10
Showing results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Radio Link Timer

  1. #1
    Member Reputation: 461
    Join Date
    2008-09-26
    Location
    World
    Posts
    392


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful.

    Default Radio Link Timer

    Dears,

    I would like to change the RLT for a region, I would like to know how to choose a correct value

    The recommended value is 20 for city and 32 for rural

    Regards,

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #2
    Member Reputation: 238
    Join Date
    2009-01-20
    Posts
    539


    Default Re: Radio Link Timer

    Hi

    Just keep 24 in city and 32 outside ...

    will defnitely help to reduce TCH drops

    Regards
    Plannegruy

  4. #3
    VIP Member Reputation: 1118
    Join Date
    2011-01-26
    Posts
    1,075


    Default Re: Radio Link Timer

    @ plannerguy, best value at your suggestion. Don't forget with ARLT if you implemented AMR Feature (differencies is 10). ex : RLT 24 put ARLT 34
    If this document usefull, then giving some reputations is highly appreciated.

    note : see default password

  5. #4
    Member Reputation: 461
    Join Date
    2008-09-26
    Location
    World
    Posts
    392


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful.

    Default Re: Radio Link Timer

    What's the relation between AMR and RLT?

  6. #5
    Senior Member Reputation: 803
    Join Date
    2011-10-23
    Posts
    430


    Default Re: Radio Link Timer

    Quote Originally Posted by peanut View Post
    What's the relation between AMR and RLT?
    In AMR, the quality of call even with lower C/I is acceptable so it's less sensitive to higher RLT making it possible to maintain a call with more RLT value!

  7. #6
    Junior Member Reputation: 10
    Join Date
    2012-01-27
    Posts
    2


    Default Re: Radio Link Timer

    RLT = 28 with AMR and RLT = 20 without AMR should be ok

  8. #7
    Member Reputation: 54
    Join Date
    2011-12-31
    Posts
    222


    Default Re: Radio Link Timer

    Hi Plannerguy,

    Look the technical reason for having higher value of RLT in case of AMR is as

    during the speech in GSM, TCH and SACCH/FACCH data is transitted over the structure of 26 TDMA frames. Please note AMR variation is only applicable on speech, so there are chances if we increase RLT, the connection can be saved. We increase time as logically there are chances that connection qaulity improves and rescued.

    After AMR, one known issue is the subscriber may get clean voice till call drop. Reason is that speech data is protected due to AMR (error connection and Dectection) BUT SACCH remains the same.

    So it is recommended to have higher values of AMRRLT. hope it is clear now.

    BR//
    Imran

  9. #8
    Member Reputation: 50
    Join Date
    2011-02-03
    Posts
    376


    Default Re: Radio Link Timer

    Quote Originally Posted by Muhammad Imran Rafique View Post
    Hi Plannerguy,

    Look the technical reason for having higher value of RLT in case of AMR is as

    during the speech in GSM, TCH and SACCH/FACCH data is transitted over the structure of 26 TDMA frames. Please note AMR variation is only applicable on speech, so there are chances if we increase RLT, the connection can be saved. We increase time as logically there are chances that connection qaulity improves and rescued.

    After AMR, one known issue is the subscriber may get clean voice till call drop. Reason is that speech data is protected due to AMR (error connection and Dectection) BUT SACCH remains the same.

    So it is recommended to have higher values of AMRRLT. hope it is clear now.

    BR//
    Imran
    Please Muhammad Imran Rafique, I need more explanation, I still don't understand why we have to keep AMR with higher RLT ??
    Many thanks

  10. #9
    Member Reputation: 54
    Join Date
    2011-12-31
    Posts
    222


    Default Re: Radio Link Timer

    Dear Fahmi,

    Attached document is explaining the scenario with details. Just keep in mind AMR will not impact on SACCH (bits), i mean they are not adaptive with varing C/I.

    RLT is responsible to release call which is purely based on SACCH frame decoding, it expect the same quality for speech bits also. in case of AMR this is not the case.

    BR//
    Imran
    Attachment 24286

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •