Thanks Thanks:  2
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Showing results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Improve PS InteRAT HO success rate.

  1. #1
    Member Reputation: 27
    Join Date
    2010-04-19
    Posts
    20


    Default Improve PS InteRAT HO success rate.

    Hi experts,

    Could you tell me how to improve PS InteRAT HO success rate.

    Thank in advance!

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #2
    Member Reputation: 293
    Join Date
    2011-01-18
    Posts
    243


    Default Re: Improve PS InteRAT HO success rate.

    me too struggling with the same thing, but I have implemented quite a few things that showed little improvement still looking for more concrete solutions;

    1. 2G definitions (BCCH, LAC, BSIC, CI) etc in 3G RNCs.
    2. No fluctuations in SGSN (not in the hands of RF engg).
    3. Proper neighbor planning.
    4. Tweaking IRAT HO triggering parameters (RSCP, EcNo) depending on cases.

    And all the above mentioned steps should be continued on a regular basis to see improvement as it will take quite a few weeks.



    Thanks.

  4. #3
    Member Reputation: 58
    Join Date
    2011-03-12
    Posts
    44


    Default Re: Improve PS InteRAT HO success rate.

    Hi,
    In case of e******* you can also check this parmeter and play with it.
    timeReleaseIuPs - Guard timer, in case the PS CN does not release the Iu connection after an IRATHO (inter radio access technology handover) to GSM.

  5. #4
    Member Reputation: 172
    Join Date
    2010-11-01
    Posts
    515


    Default Re: Improve PS InteRAT HO success rate.

    Quote Originally Posted by phuvuong_uk View Post
    Hi experts,

    Could you tell me how to improve PS InteRAT HO success rate.

    Thank in advance!

    What is your current success rate and what is the reason for none successfull ones (based on KPIs) ? Vendor?

    BR

  6. #5
    Member Reputation: 26
    Join Date
    2011-09-11
    Posts
    51


    Default Re: Improve PS InteRAT HO success rate.

    Ensure stability on your TX links. PS is very sensitive.

  7. #6
    Member Reputation: 27
    Join Date
    2010-04-19
    Posts
    20


    Default Re: Improve PS InteRAT HO success rate.

    Quote Originally Posted by agenov View Post
    What is your current success rate and what is the reason for none successfull ones (based on KPIs) ? Vendor?

    BR

    About 93.83%. Vendor is Huawei. actually, the reason we are finding!

  8. #7
    Member Reputation: 27
    Join Date
    2010-04-19
    Posts
    20


    Default Re: Improve PS InteRAT HO success rate.

    Quote Originally Posted by karna View Post
    Hi,
    In case of e******* you can also check this parmeter and play with it.
    timeReleaseIuPs - Guard timer, in case the PS CN does not release the Iu connection after an IRATHO (inter radio access technology handover) to GSM.

    This parameter is in the cell level or RNC, BSC level?

  9. #8
    Member Reputation: 141
    Join Date
    2009-10-19
    Location
    Sandton
    Posts
    139


    Default Re: Improve PS InteRAT HO success rate.

    PS irat is always more difficult to analyse since it includes 2 side SGSN in the process.
    Phu, are you enable relocation in PS Irat ? 2G load is fine ?
    Also, try to plot your stats with 3G RAC Border and 2G as well, perhaps you find s'thing.

    Rgds,

  10. #9
    Member Reputation: 25
    Join Date
    2009-06-10
    Posts
    20


    Default Re: Improve PS InteRAT HO success rate.

    Hi,
    timeReleaseIuPs is RNC Level Parameter.

    Guard timer, in case the PS CN does not release the Iu connection after an IRATHO (inter radio access technology handover) to GSM.
    Special values:
    0: infinity (this means that this timer should not be used)
    Unit: s
    Range: 0 to 120, Default=10

    Quote Originally Posted by phuvuong_uk View Post
    This parameter is in the cell level or RNC, BSC level?

  11. #10
    Member Reputation: 172
    Join Date
    2010-11-01
    Posts
    515


    Default Re: Improve PS InteRAT HO success rate.

    This is not so bad at all!
    Check the KPIs of contributors, do LMT trace or drive test in the area to see where the problem comes from..? The reason for this kind of failures are too many really.

    Quote Originally Posted by phuvuong_uk View Post
    About 93.83%. Vendor is Huawei. actually, the reason we are finding!

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •