Discovery vs Actix - EVDO revA

[nrandjelovic]

What tool is better for post processing of drive test measurements for ev-do rvA system?

[ithink]

CNA can, Actix also. (can read .apt,.log, .dt1, etc)

What tool is better for post processing of drive test measurements for ev-do rvA system?

[Motorola]

What tool is better for post processing of drive test measurements for ev-do rvA system?

Actix of course, since it is ment to handle different platforms and vendors

[EJAY]

if you are using tems log file, it is better to use discovery. if different dt tools you must use actix

[nevy_14]

i proposed Actix,since its not related to any vendor so i think the analysis will be more objective..CMIIW

BR,
nevy_14

[Thewind]

I vote for Actix. I think Actix is best, like to do the troubleshooting.

When i did look the TEMS Inv the call sts (failied, dropped) is different with TEMS RA. But Actix is possible to find all the events, even TEMS events, and we find one by one easily.

Bad thing that Actix take time and memory to load the log.

[Geor]

i proposed Actix,since its not related to any vendor so i think the analysis will be more objective..CMIIW

BR,
nevy_14

Any day Actix over Discovery. Vendor neutral post processing tools add lot more value. Gladiator is another one.

[Geor]

I vote for Actix. I think Actix is best, like to do the troubleshooting.

When i did look the TEMS Inv the call sts (failied, dropped) is different with TEMS RA. But Actix is possible to find all the events, even TEMS events, and we find one by one easily.

Bad thing that Actix take time and memory to load the log.

Try Gladiator to mitigate time and memory issues.

[Motorola]

Frankly speaking, I would suggest Nemo Analyzer

[TEMS]

Frankly speaking, I would suggest Nemo Analyzer

when we use Nemo analyzer to analysis log file TEMS Inv some time missing Event also

I think the Atix it is OK because it use SQL