who is the best microwave transmission vendor?

[spatkad]

Hi all,

With the attached pdf of facts, I think ceragon has the best microwave transmission products. I believe ceragon ranks 1st among equals.

correct me if i am wrong

spatkad

[BENDISA]

For me is one first Rate NEC and E******* for second

[tonybosell]

Hi all,

With the attached pdf of facts, I think ceragon has the best microwave transmission products. I believe ceragon ranks 1st among equals.

correct me if i am wrong

spatkad
I have read your information and I think you are correct, ceragon has the best microwave transmission product because it is largest mobile network operator in the whole world and supported to its network in whole world. It is no 1 company in the whole world.

[pravdivi]

for me E/// still best MW vendor, i'm comparing it with huawei and nsn, but huawei have better management system.

[bino]

For me is one first Rate NEC and E******* for second

I agree with you.
Last year, my company had installation project > 4000 hop pasolink NEC for 2 operators.

[spatkad]

for me E/// still best MW vendor, i'm comparing it with huawei and nsn, but huawei have better management system.

I hear that since huawei has no trunk MW system or since it has failed to copy the leading TRUNK microwave vendors to develop it's own, then it is out of the league of true MW vendors

[mimoX]

NEC. cannot answer more than one coz the best can only be one.

[pravdivi]

Maybe we should add a poll?

[hsyfcs]

Thank you very much!!!

[mike]

For those that believe spatkad is wrong, It would be good to see a document about a case of Study From E*******, NEC, Huawei, etc about their products. No just an opinion. I want to learn why this vendor is the best based on a a document or a paper.

Thanks,

Mike:cool:

[pravdivi]

For those that believe spatkad is wrong, It would be good to see a document about a case of Study From E*******, NEC, Huawei, etc about their products. No just an opinion. I want to learn why this vendor is the best based on a a document or a paper.

Thanks,

Mike:cool:

you have to work with equipment to make decision - who is best vendor. By reading you will find that every vendor telling "We are the best".
Really, it good to have hands-on experience with equipment

[mike]

I understand your point, but even if you have experience with vendors first you need to read the technical paper before making any decision about which vendor is the best in certain scenarious. Equiments become outdated very easy and sometimes there is not enough time to test or have experience with all the vendors. When two vendors have equipments with similar characteristics in terms of technical specifications, we request a test for each vendor in order to verify that what they are telling is true. If they are lying, this can means a penalty for several years or a loss of any possible contract that can involve millions of dollars. So, if Anyone have had experience with more than one vendor, it should be good a short explanation about why vendor A is better than vendor B and viceversa. I think that just mentioning the name is not enough.

Mike:cool:

you have to work with equipment to make decision - who is best vendor. By reading you will find that every vendor telling "We are the best".
Really, it good to have hands-on experience with equipment

[pravdivi]

For shure before making decisions you have to read technical docks to compare, but most of issues appear during everyday work. As an example, once E/// sold outdoor units with the hardware bug, whole lote of equipment came with this bug

[byja]

First of all, you can't just simplify things and ask which MW equipment is the best. Best for what exactly? Which car is the best? You'll get million different answers, all of them correct. (OK, we all know that the best car is a company car)
Second, according to the decision-makers, best MW equipment is the one that is cheapest. Who cares about some stupid technical specifications, characteristics, failure rates, after-sale support, etc. Once management & procurement guys decide, it is up to the tech department to get in line with this decision and don't bother anyone with some stupid tests and trials. This belongs to the past now.
So the best MW vendor is the cheapest one. Till another one gets even cheaper and worse components and does a cost reduction.

[pravdivi]

First of all, you can't just simplify things and ask which MW equipment is the best. Best for what exactly? Which car is the best? You'll get million different answers, all of them correct. (OK, we all know that the best car is a company car)
Second, according to the decision-makers, best MW equipment is the one that is cheapest. Who cares about some stupid technical specifications, characteristics, failure rates, after-sale support, etc. Once management & procurement guys decide, it is up to the tech department to get in line with this decision and don't bother anyone with some stupid tests and trials. This belongs to the past now.
So the best MW vendor is the cheapest one. Till another one gets even cheaper and worse components and does a cost reduction.

But we are not talking from managers point of view, i think we discussing as technical guys