Thanks Thanks:  0
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Showing results 1 to 10 of 30

Thread: SHO overhead

  1. #1
    Member Reputation: 344
    Join Date
    2009-08-19
    Location
    Armenia
    Posts
    223


    Default SHO overhead

    Hi experts,

    I'm working on SHO overhead optimisation on UMTS900 and UMTS2100 layers; I have a lot of cells with excessive SHO overhead; For rural sites, i can apply more downtilt to reduce the SHO area; for urban and dense urban sites i have the same problem but i can't downtilt because the tilt is already 8, 9 or 10, i thought about reducing the Active set size to 2 but it's not good idea cuz i will loose SHO gain..

    Can anyone light my way with some good ideas in order to optimise to the normal range which is 30%-40% and share some experience related to this task.

    Br

    Nabil

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #2
    Member Reputation: 50
    Join Date
    2009-11-29
    Posts
    207


    Default

    Nabil

    i am assuming u have the right sorts of neighbours defined. there are a few ways to acheive this

    You could increase your threshold for adding which would avoid weak radio legs, you could change hystersis which would also do similar thing. There are also priorities defined for the neighbous so you could do that.

    BTW having more than 3 RL would it give you much SHO gain anyways ? i doubt it

  4. #3
    Member Reputation: 344
    Join Date
    2009-08-19
    Location
    Armenia
    Posts
    223


    Default

    Thanks for your answer, i already tried that but in vain!

    Do u know how to implement prorities for neighbours with NSN vendor?

    I know that in ZTE but NSN i should dig in

    Br,

    Nabil

  5. #4
    VIP Member Reputation: 1849 wolverine's Avatar
    Join Date
    2009-01-16
    Posts
    835


    Default

    Have you examined the possibility of reducing the power of the pilot channel (CPICH)? This is usually the second step if downtilting doesn't work/isn't possible.

  6. #5
    Member Reputation: 344
    Join Date
    2009-08-19
    Location
    Armenia
    Posts
    223


    Default

    It's a risky solution man

  7. #6
    Member Reputation: 73
    Join Date
    2007-10-11
    Posts
    164


    Default

    How high is the antenna height for urban area and dense urban implemented?
    Physical changes such as lowering the antenna height also might help.

  8. #7
    Member Reputation: 555
    Join Date
    2008-07-08
    Location
    UAE
    Posts
    474


    Default

    Hi,

    Reducing the SHO, its better to apply to antenna downtilt for the cells which we dont want to serve, or if you want to make it difficult SHO for specific neighbour you can apply Cell Individual Offset or EcNo Offset for that neighbour.

    br

  9. #8
    Member Reputation: 344
    Join Date
    2009-08-19
    Location
    Armenia
    Posts
    223


    Default

    Hi guys,

    I realised that mostly all U900 cells have SHO overhead higher than 50%; seems global problem.

    Anyone have an idea.

    Thank u guys

  10. #9
    Member Reputation: 555
    Join Date
    2008-07-08
    Location
    UAE
    Posts
    474


    Default

    Do you work on U900-2100 SHO or separately ?

  11. #10
    Member Reputation: 344
    Join Date
    2009-08-19
    Location
    Armenia
    Posts
    223


    Default

    I'm working on U9-U21 together, what's the effect?

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •