Thanks Thanks:  2
Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Showing results 1 to 10 of 41

Thread: VALUE MOS NEMO OUTDOOR 5.2 vs NEMO HANDY 2.9

  1. #1
    Member Reputation: 25
    Join Date
    2010-01-04
    Location
    CHINA, guangzhou
    Posts
    101


    Default VALUE MOS NEMO OUTDOOR 5.2 vs NEMO HANDY 2.9

    Dear all fam

    Help fellas i had trouble with MOS by NEMO , im using Nemo Outdoor ver 5.20 and Nemo Handy ver 2.9 ( N96 ) im curious bout MOS value..i already test with NO using teratec mediafire6 for mobile to mobile, that is true the NO shown the mos value bout 2.8 ( average ) and the parameter is stable..and the 2nd scenario im using NH ver 2.9 ( N96) for mobile to mobile...and same scenario script with NO and the result is, the mos value by NH very2 strange unstable ( sometimes didnt show the value ), and the value is more higher until 3.5 than NO.... how come i was read my tutorial the comparison NO (PESQ) and NH (PSM) less than 0.2 ?

    please guys help me to solve this problem...

    thanks

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #2
    Member Reputation: 25
    Join Date
    2010-01-04
    Location
    CHINA, guangzhou
    Posts
    101


    Default

    come on guys help me

  4. #3
    Moderator Reputation: 3584
    Join Date
    2008-01-20
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    1,093


    Default

    You can have one or two problems (depending on the version numers you're using)

    1) You are using not an comformance (read correct filtered) sample

    2) You're comparing different Pesq algo's to each other

  5. #4
    Member Reputation: 25
    Join Date
    2010-01-04
    Location
    CHINA, guangzhou
    Posts
    101


    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DCA View Post
    You can have one or two problems (depending on the version numers you're using)

    1) You are using not an comformance (read correct filtered) sample

    2) You're comparing different Pesq algo's to each other
    sorry im not cleared

    when i compared with nemo outdoor 5 ..it happened again but.the value between NO5 and NH2.9 not much as comparing NO4 and NH2.9, more decrease using NO5. im using the same scenario and lock the same band and channel but i still dont get it..why the nemo handy value more unstable ?

    in your opininion sir DCA which the valid one for MOS measurement NO or NH ?

    thanks

  6. #5
    Moderator Reputation: 3584
    Join Date
    2008-01-20
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    1,093


    Default

    Use the ITU PESQ ref samples to get the answer straight.
    Later versions of Nemo are using the P-S-Y-T-E-C-H-N-I-C-S dll and it causes trouble. Earlier versions using the O-P-T-I-C-O-M dll which is more stable. But it all depends on using the correct reference sample.

    Can't tell if NO or NH is better, don't use NH myself

  7. #6
    Member Reputation: 25
    Join Date
    2010-01-04
    Location
    CHINA, guangzhou
    Posts
    101


    Default

    oke thanks boss....

    soon i will send you the doc bout comparison NO and NA from anite

  8. #7
    Senior Member Reputation: 502
    Join Date
    2008-11-05
    Posts
    1,025


    Default

    hi my i really need your help for MOS measurement i did with nemo outdoor5.3 and i have alot of test with sample reference in nemo 4s.wav the strange is that in all radio condition i cannot get mos more than 2 in average and the volume level for mobile at max but still the what could be reason

  9. #8
    Member Reputation: 25
    Join Date
    2010-01-04
    Location
    CHINA, guangzhou
    Posts
    101


    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RF engineer View Post
    hi my i really need your help for MOS measurement i did with nemo outdoor5.3 and i have alot of test with sample reference in nemo 4s.wav the strange is that in all radio condition i cannot get mos more than 2 in average and the volume level for mobile at max but still the what could be reason
    dear boss can you explained us your scenario and your tools precisely..what kind of sound card did u have..?

    im user friendly with teratec mediafire6

  10. #9
    Member Reputation: 25
    Join Date
    2010-01-04
    Location
    CHINA, guangzhou
    Posts
    101


    Default

    thanks DCA i found the problem
    Last edited by px150; 2010-08-22 at 04:53 PM Reason: edited

  11. #10
    Senior Member Reputation: 502
    Join Date
    2008-11-05
    Posts
    1,025


    Default

    yes exactly iam using the same do you have any explanation

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •