Thanks Thanks:  14
Showing results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: RX_Branch_attenuation & CQI

  1. #1
    Member Reputation: 164
    Join Date
    2012-03-20
    Posts
    148


    Default RX_Branch_attenuation & CQI

    Hi all,

    Please find attached my trial and my questions

    I just curious about relation between setting attenuation in RXBranch NodeB with CQI distribution.

    Hope smb can explain it.

    Thanks
    Br//Paul
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Attached Files Attached Files

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #2
    Member Reputation: 142
    Join Date
    2012-05-24
    Posts
    42


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful.

    Default Re: RX_Branch_attenuation & CQI

    The result is logical, Rx attenuation attenuate the signal in Uplink and then RTWP.
    If RTWP decrease so the load of Uplink decrease, this is why HSUPA throughput increase because it is based on scheduling algorithm to schedule throughput according to Uplink load that is configured generally 75% if this load is reached the HSUPA throughput is low that impact HSDPA since HSDPA is sensitive to Uplink TCP TACK.
    The 75% UL load is exceed when RTWP beyond -98 (if Background noise is -103 dB).

  4. Thanks Tcacoilo, radio_network thanked for this post
  5. #3
    Member Reputation: 95
    Join Date
    2012-05-22
    Posts
    292


    Default Re: RX_Branch_attenuation & CQI

    Dear Paulus,

    Good results and share , did u find any drawback of attenuating RXBranch Signal strength like voice impacted and so on ?

  6. #4
    Senior Member Reputation: 491
    Join Date
    2008-08-14
    Posts
    2,954


    Default Re: RX_Branch_attenuation & CQI

    Dears,
    correct me if Iam wrong, we use Attenuation in RX Branch Only
    when TMA installed in site

  7. #5
    VIP Member Reputation: 1017
    Join Date
    2014-03-10
    Posts
    547


    Default Re: RX_Branch_attenuation & CQI

    @justdream I think so, if the no TMA is installed RxBRanch should be zero.

  8. Thanks justdream thanked for this post
  9. #6
    Member Reputation: 164
    Join Date
    2012-03-20
    Posts
    148


    Default Re: RX_Branch_attenuation & CQI

    Quote Originally Posted by mounir34 View Post
    @justdream I think so, if the no TMA is installed RxBRanch should be zero.
    Hi Guys,

    Yes correct. Actually, this RxBranch is blacklist parameter in Huawei. But, this really impact positively in UL THP. We usually apply this attenuation in picocell, instead of

    macrocell. Believe it or not, it doesn't affect the DL RSCP based on drive test result. The negative impact is only that UL HSUPA payload decreased, seems that user in

    edge coverage cell would be a little bit difficult to get UL access. But instead of viewing this disadvantage, coverage in picocell mostly in a good level as there should be

    many antennas, and if this is implemented in macrocell, just make sure that the surrounding area is also covered by 3G sites.

    Dear Gunpowder, I didn't find any drawback in voice at all. This work well till now. Moreover, this attenuation will improve RTWP, this of course will give improvement

    also in accessibility. I mean like this. If the RTWP is -85, user with lower level,e.g -90 dBm, experience difficulty in accessing the network. When attenuation is set and

    improve RTWP to -98 dBm, then that user, in the same position, can access the network easily.

    Thanks
    Br//Paul

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •