Thanks Thanks:  17
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Showing results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: AAL2 Congestion

  1. #1
    Member Reputation: 116
    Join Date
    2010-04-24
    Location
    africa
    Posts
    82


    Default AAL2 Congestion

    Hi Experts,

    I'm still learning the transport part of UMTS. I'm still a newbie that is why I'm asking for expert advices.
    I have encountered this KPI on the PMR of the moshell. And I have found this values which has congestion.

    56) RNC Q.Aal2 Setup Performance (Aal2Ap)
    Object Aal2Congestion Aal2SetupFail NoAal2SetupAttempts
    b252 1.84 2.88 2604

    Could someone make an expert judgement and analysis on how to solve the congestion. What are the related parameters I need to look at.

    BR,
    ice

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #2
    Member Reputation: 33
    Join Date
    2009-08-07
    Posts
    71


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful.

    Default Re: AAL2 Congestion

    Hi,

    I dont know it this is already posted here in the forum but you may check this site http://www.scribd.com/doc/57893609/1...-per-AAL2-Path

    You will see some explanations and counter description.

    Hope this can help

    Br,
    Sen

  4. #3
    Member Reputation: 116
    Join Date
    2010-04-24
    Location
    africa
    Posts
    82


    Default Re: AAL2 Congestion

    Quote Originally Posted by senjamir View Post
    Hi,

    I dont know it this is already posted here in the forum but you may check this site http://www.scribd.com/doc/57893609/1...-per-AAL2-Path

    You will see some explanations and counter description.

    Hope this can help

    Br,
    Sen

    Thanks.. what do you think we can increase to remove the congestion. The document doesn't provide any suggestions.

  5. #4
    Member Reputation: 71
    Join Date
    2010-09-28
    Location
    Mex - Ecatepec
    Posts
    201


    Default Re: AAL2 Congestion

    Have you try to verify if there are some errors/second over your Tx ?

  6. #5
    Member Reputation: 116
    Join Date
    2010-04-24
    Location
    africa
    Posts
    82


    Default Re: AAL2 Congestion

    I have tried it but the cells having Es/Ses are not the one's having the congestion. For the AAL2 failures, yes they where the one's having TX Es. I'm having congestion on ClassA-CS12 only not in Class C. Is there any parameter related to this?

  7. #6
    Member Reputation: 62
    Join Date
    2011-08-31
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    52


    3 out of 3 members found this post helpful.

    Smile Re: AAL2 Congestion

    Hello,

    Check in Node B the counters in the MO Aal2Ap
    pmUnSuccInConnsLocalQosClassA
    pmUnSuccInConnsLocalQosClassB
    pmUnSuccInConnsLocalQosClassC
    pmUnSuccInConnsLocalQosClassD

    Check in RNC the counters in the MO Aal2Ap
    pmUnSuccOutConnsLocalQosClassA
    pmUnSuccOutConnsLocalQosClassB
    pmUnSuccOutConnsLocalQosClassC
    pmUnSuccOutConnsLocalQosClassD

    A - CS + Signaling
    B - PS R99
    C - HS and EUL
    D - Normally Not Used

    All common channels and CS Speech, CS Data and CS Streaming services are recommended to be configured with AAL2QoS class A.
    Best Effort packet services on DCH for Interactive and Background are recommended to be configured with AAL2QoS class B.
    The high speed data services, EUL and HSDPA, are best effort services and are recommended to be configured with AAL2QoS class C.

    If you have some of them different than 0 you have a problem.

    Note that each service consume CIDs from each Class but all B and C services consume CIDs from Class A, because all of them uses Class A for signaling, that explain you only see Class A congestion.

    Normally this type of congestion will reduce you RAB CS and HSDPA accessibility or just one of them and after adm fails.

    1) Check if your problem is not related to the Iub bandwidth. Node -> pmr -> IubDataStreams -> Check IubHsLimitingRatio, if you have 0 ok if not you can have not sufficient bandwidth or a TX bottleneck problem.

    If not...

    2) If you are having this problem just in Class A try to reduce some Eul Users and check by pmxh if the counters are reducing.

    3) If you are having problems in Class A and C you will have to duplicate VCs, when you duplicate VCs you gain more CIDs with the same bandwidth and can solve this problem, after that if the problem continues a suggest you to change this Iub for IP.


    Normally you will just duplicate VCs for Class A and C, for B you can but is not usual unless you have a high PS R99 traffic in your network.

    When you have Iub ATM problems you can:

    1) Temporally reduce Eul Users to reduce just Class A congestion or in some cases block this service until VC expansion.
    (This action will just take effect in Class A congestion and is just temporally)
    2) Resquest 2nd VC expansion for Class A and C, B just if you have congestion or high PS R99 traffic.
    3) If the action above not bring effects you must change your Iub for IP with the necessary bandwidth.
    4) Check if your Iub bandwidth is enough.

    I hope it can help you, give REP if useful...


  8. #7
    Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Reputation: 27
    Join Date
    2011-09-16
    Location
    spain
    Posts
    34


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful.

    Default Re: AAL2 Congestion

    Hi Icebreaker05,

    I have doc about congestion, maybe you will find what you are looking for on it. file attached.

    Don(t forget reputation plzE******* RBS P7 KPI Description.zipRNC Trace Guide E*******.zip

  9. #8
    Member Reputation: 116
    Join Date
    2010-04-24
    Location
    africa
    Posts
    82


    Default Re: AAL2 Congestion

    Quote Originally Posted by dadoba View Post
    Hello,

    Check in Node B the counters in the MO Aal2Ap
    pmUnSuccInConnsLocalQosClassA
    pmUnSuccInConnsLocalQosClassB
    pmUnSuccInConnsLocalQosClassC
    pmUnSuccInConnsLocalQosClassD

    Check in RNC the counters in the MO Aal2Ap
    pmUnSuccOutConnsLocalQosClassA
    pmUnSuccOutConnsLocalQosClassB
    pmUnSuccOutConnsLocalQosClassC
    pmUnSuccOutConnsLocalQosClassD

    A - CS + Signaling
    B - PS R99
    C - HS and EUL
    D - Normally Not Used

    All common channels and CS Speech, CS Data and CS Streaming services are recommended to be configured with AAL2QoS class A.
    Best Effort packet services on DCH for Interactive and Background are recommended to be configured with AAL2QoS class B.
    The high speed data services, EUL and HSDPA, are best effort services and are recommended to be configured with AAL2QoS class C.

    If you have some of them different than 0 you have a problem.

    Note that each service consume CIDs from each Class but all B and C services consume CIDs from Class A, because all of them uses Class A for signaling, that explain you only see Class A congestion.

    Normally this type of congestion will reduce you RAB CS and HSDPA accessibility or just one of them and after adm fails.

    1) Check if your problem is not related to the Iub bandwidth. Node -> pmr -> IubDataStreams -> Check IubHsLimitingRatio, if you have 0 ok if not you can have not sufficient bandwidth or a TX bottleneck problem.

    If not...

    2) If you are having this problem just in Class A try to reduce some Eul Users and check by pmxh if the counters are reducing.

    3) If you are having problems in Class A and C you will have to duplicate VCs, when you duplicate VCs you gain more CIDs with the same bandwidth and can solve this problem, after that if the problem continues a suggest you to change this Iub for IP.


    Normally you will just duplicate VCs for Class A and C, for B you can but is not usual unless you have a high PS R99 traffic in your network.

    When you have Iub ATM problems you can:

    1) Temporally reduce Eul Users to reduce just Class A congestion or in some cases block this service until VC expansion.
    (This action will just take effect in Class A congestion and is just temporally)
    2) Resquest 2nd VC expansion for Class A and C, B just if you have congestion or high PS R99 traffic.
    3) If the action above not bring effects you must change your Iub for IP with the necessary bandwidth.
    4) Check if your Iub bandwidth is enough.

    I hope it can help you, give REP if useful...

    On your suggestion #1. How the number of EUL users configured can reduce Class A congestion. I have 4 E1's on site, numEULusers is 8 per cell. How can I get the EUL utilization in this case.

    Thanks and hope for your reply.

  10. #9
    Member Reputation: 555
    Join Date
    2008-07-08
    Location
    UAE
    Posts
    474


    Default Re: AAL2 Congestion

    Im not familiar to e///, but try to check the CID (connection id), the atm has maximum number of connection per VC, then if you have this rejection, try to add VC for User plane or control plane

  11. #10
    Member Reputation: 62
    Join Date
    2011-08-31
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    52


    2 out of 2 members found this post helpful.

    Default Re: AAL2 Congestion

    4 E1's is not a problem, it doesn't matter. Your 4 E1's give you 8 Mbps bandwidth and the question here is not bandwidth, but you can check it using another counters. The question here is CID Utilization as our friend said. Eul uses 2 Class A CIDs + 1 Class C CID, then you probably having problems in Class A and it is affecting signaling which affects all you Node-B and/or RNC counters and performance. The remedy for it is reduce some Eul Users or disable Eul after that create a second VC por Class A and second VC por Class C, this way you double the CID capacity with the same bandwidth. If you are having values different from 0 in pmr -> IubDataStreams -> Check IubHsLimitingRatio (Normally in Spi03) consider IUB change for IP or add more E1's, but is necessary create second VCs if you choose add more E1's to avoid problems with CID usage.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •