Thanks Thanks:  10
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Showing results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Discussion : Vendors Performance Comparison

  1. #1
    Member Reputation: 532
    Join Date
    2012-05-04
    Posts
    511


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful.

    Default Discussion : Vendors Performance Comparison

    Hi friends,
    As most of us know that Chinese vendors Huawei & ZTE are always balmed that their KPIs show much improved picture of the network and hide many network problems by just disabling some counters or increasing timer values.... etc.
    Can anyone share his own experience with some live examples (Counter/Timer/parameter examples?) to prove that this is fact ?

    Thanks for sharing knowledge!
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Thanks!

    Pass: optimizer

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #2
    Member Reputation: 532
    Join Date
    2012-05-04
    Posts
    511


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful.

    Default Re: Discussion : Vendors Performance Comparison

    Hi experts,
    Please share your thoughts.
    Thanks!

  4. #3
    Member Reputation: 56
    Join Date
    2009-05-06
    Posts
    66


    Default Re: Discussion : Vendors Performance Comparison

    coz u assume that u know so that means u have prove... u share first then others will follow.......

  5. #4
    Junior Member Reputation: 15
    Join Date
    2010-06-19
    Posts
    23


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful.

    Default Re: Discussion : Vendors Performance Comparison

    Yes, I have an experience...Initially in our NW, YBF drop was very high. We have given too much pressure on Huawei. Suddenly, it started improved from next day onwards. After that we identified that Hu changed N3101, N3103 and improved Tbf drop.

  6. #5
    Member Reputation: 532
    Join Date
    2012-05-04
    Posts
    511


    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful.

    Default Re: Discussion : Vendors Performance Comparison

    We swapped NSN 2G with Huawei 2G and SDCCH drops improved from 1.5% to 0.4% !!!
    We asked the vendor for justification and then we found the answer that there is a timer in BSC 6000/6900 which dosn't pegs SDCCH drop until this timer is expired so most of SDCCH drops are actually not pegged.
    Timer name is DelaySendFailIndtoMSIP.
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Thanks!

    Pass: optimizer

  7. #6
    Junior Member Reputation: 15
    Join Date
    2010-06-19
    Posts
    23


    Default Re: Discussion : Vendors Performance Comparison

    Quote Originally Posted by khurrambilal01 View Post
    We swapped NSN 2G with Huawei 2G and SDCCH drops improved from 1.5% to 0.4% !!!
    We asked the vendor for justification and then we found the answer that there is a timer in BSC 6000/6900 which dosn't pegs SDCCH drop until this timer is expired so most of SDCCH drops are actually not pegged.
    Timer name is DelaySendFailIndtoMSIP.
    Can you please help to share the improvement steps of UL Quality for ZTE?

  8. #7
    Member Reputation: 322
    Join Date
    2011-05-18
    Posts
    241


    Default Re: Discussion : Vendors Performance Comparison

    also dont forget the radical T305 and T308 timer delays brings down Drop call rate by atleast 50% and also the call restablishment trial u can set re-establish timer to 40 seconds seriously who waits that long...no one can compete with Huawei when it comes to KPIs some of my BSCs have DCR running at the same precise value to last couple of weeks not even little fluctuation.....and the place i worK huawei CSSR formula dosent even include CS-Blocking so its basically a straight line........of all the vendors i have worked on ******** is one with most easy to understand KPI definition and very hard to improve as for CSSR they include eveyything from CM Serv Request to successful call.....

  9. #8
    Member Reputation: 306
    Join Date
    2010-10-18
    Posts
    334


    Default Re: Discussion : Vendors Performance Comparison

    Quote Originally Posted by usama0795 View Post
    also dont forget the radical T305 and T308 timer delays brings down Drop call rate by atleast 50% and also the call restablishment trial u can set re-establish timer to 40 seconds seriously who waits that long...no one can compete with Huawei when it comes to KPIs some of my BSCs have DCR running at the same precise value to last couple of weeks not even little fluctuation.....and the place i worK huawei CSSR formula dosent even include CS-Blocking so its basically a straight line........of all the vendors i have worked on ******** is one with most easy to understand KPI definition and very hard to improve as for CSSR they include eveyything from CM Serv Request to successful call.....
    My Nw CSSR is with blocking involed some how. But it is very lightly change when we upgraded Trx but it is not strange since it is so high already. But CSSR with another vendor E******* is change differently.

    Any suggestion/advice to check timers/parameters?

  10. #9
    Member Reputation: 264
    Join Date
    2012-01-26
    Posts
    311


    Default Re: Discussion : Vendors Performance Comparison

    In our Nw we did A swap from LG to ZTE (CDMA) and the call drop rate decrease from 3 to less than 1

    Also in CSSR they have a counter called call outer interruption with large numbers and it's not accounted as call failure.

    Till now I still dupt their KPI values

  11. #10
    Member Reputation: 264
    Join Date
    2012-01-26
    Posts
    311


    Default Re: Discussion : Vendors Performance Comparison

    Also If Anyone has a comparison between ZTE, Huawei and LG I will appreciate it

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •