TTI from 10 ms to 2ms

[atul22]

Hi,
As per my knowledge, in 10 ms TTI it is transmitted 32 kbps and it is consumed 1 CE.
In 2 ms TTI it is transmtted 160 kbps and consumed 8CE.
In 2ms TTI ,for max throughput 2X2+2X4 SF . so SF2 it transmitted 1.92mbps and SF4 it transmitted 960 kbps .it will get around 5.7 mbps .
and 96 CE is consumed to get this much speed.

BR//
atul

[_lisi4king]

Hi,
As per my knowledge, in 10 ms TTI it is transmitted 32 kbps and it is consumed 1 CE.
In 2 ms TTI it is transmtted 160 kbps and consumed 8CE.
In 2ms TTI ,for max throughput 2X2+2X4 SF . so SF2 it transmitted 1.92mbps and SF4 it transmitted 960 kbps .it will get around 5.7 mbps .
and 96 CE is consumed to get this much speed.

BR//
atul

Thank for your responce, but my main qestion was not about HSDPA or HSUPA, main qestion is how does TTI influent on throughput (if influent )

[dholama]

with 2ms TTI you can respond faster to Link conditions. So if you have a link which is good you can get higher throughput due to quick allocation. Hence we could get better than average bit rates and hence gain in throughput.

[_lisi4king]

with 2ms TTI you can respond faster to Link conditions. So if you have a link which is good you can get higher throughput due to quick allocation. Hence we could get better than average bit rates and hence gain in throughput.

So i'm i rigth, if we are in laboratory and in excelent conditions, possible to say, that it doesn't matter which TTI (2 ms or 10 ms) we use?

[oswe]

Thank for your responce, but my main qestion was not about HSDPA or HSUPA, main qestion is how does TTI influent on throughput (if influent )

it is like they´ve explained before... that it frees up codes to be used...

[firstmaxim]

Another way of looking at it is that you more HARQ instances that can be defined with 2ms TTI compared to a 10ms TTI.