Radio Parameter Comparison of TEMS & NEMO

[aquatic]

hi there,

We found problem during the BM done, with Nemo and the TEMS. With Nemo all the KPI's are coming poor, while with TEMS it is quite good. Also, RxLev is also quite different.

So, please help me to find the sensitivity of the MS, we are using (Sony EricssionW995 is used for TEMS & Nokia C5 is used for NEMO)

RxLev Sub.jpg


Hoping for some suggestion.


Thank you.

[donny_trisnadi]

never quiety compare knowllegde ..but maybe ill want to know 2 what is the answer....

BR
Tems boys

[justdream]

Dear aquatic,

Have you drived same route in same time using both TEMS & NEMO?

[tremalnike]

One more question related to this case - how NEMO realized Nokia C5 external antenna ? May be using inductive way (something like this http://www.mobileextras.com.au/Produ...5/Default.aspx )? Few years ago I used Nokia 6680 with external inductive antenna, and it provide ~6-8 dB lower RSCP measurements (2100Mhz) than UMTS scanner with standard ex. antenna.

Here you can find more info about inductive external antennas http://www.telcoantennas.com.au/site/guidetopatchleads. They say "Cradles typically have a transfer loss of between 1-2dB depending on the design". May be this is the answer - TEMS SE W995 using standart SMA connector for external antenna and there is no additional loses.