Thanks Thanks:  3
Showing results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: 2G/3G same LAC

  1. #1
    Member Reputation: 255
    Join Date
    2009-12-13
    Posts
    118


    Post 2G/3G same LAC

    Dears,

    would you please share your experience in the below points:

    1- Is this logic to have same LAC in 2G cells & 3G cells if they are connected to same core?
    2- If Q1 answer is yes, will this reduce paging loss "mobile out of service" during 3g<>2G re-selection?


    thanks.
    regards,

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #2
    Member Reputation: 416
    Join Date
    2010-06-16
    Posts
    321


    Default Re: 2G/3G same LAC

    Quote Originally Posted by sala70vic View Post
    Dears,

    would you please share your experience in the below points:

    1- Is this logic to have same LAC in 2G cells & 3G cells if they are connected to same core?
    2- If Q1 answer is yes, will this reduce paging loss "mobile out of service" during 3g<>2G re-selection?


    thanks.
    regards,
    1. yes
    2. yes

    it has been talked about:

    http://www.finetopix.com/live-optimi...een-2g-3g.html


    br
    s52d

  4. #3
    Member Reputation: 255
    Join Date
    2009-12-13
    Posts
    118


    Default Re: 2G/3G same LAC

    Quote Originally Posted by s52d View Post
    1. yes
    2. yes

    it has been talked about:

    http://www.finetopix.com/live-optimi...een-2g-3g.html


    br
    s52d
    Hi,

    Thanks for your reply, have you any report, test case, KPIs, showing the impact of common LA?

    Currently our Paging Success rate around 90% (3G).

    thanks.
    regards,

  5. #4
    Member Reputation: 416
    Join Date
    2010-06-16
    Posts
    321


    Default Re: 2G/3G same LAC

    Quote Originally Posted by sala70vic View Post
    Hi,

    Thanks for your reply, have you any report, test case, KPIs, showing the impact of common LA?

    Currently our Paging Success rate around 90% (3G).

    thanks.
    regards,
    Hi!
    To summarize: by having common LA, you:
    1. reduce signalling (less LAU, less battery consuption)
    2. less missed calls complains
    3. huge benefit for small number of terminals where BOTH RANs are very weak
    Some prerequisites:
    - common VLR
    - core people capable of defining it properly ;-). Remember, it is core!
    - no silly national roaming agreements preventing it
    - no differentiation between users (GSM only SIM, UTRAN only SIM etc)

    Test case: do it in small region and test. It is easy to do, if you have common VLR.
    Please note: it can not be done on PS domain (no common RA).
    test: monitor LAU stats, paging.

    paging KPIs: as those cases are rare, you will not notice big change.
    It is lost in noise (not statistically significant).
    But you will notice less "5 bars and then I got missed call SMS" complains.

    We did trial:
    Terminal with capability to force RAT change.
    At the same time:
    - dial number of the terminal
    - force terminal into another RAT
    When different VLR: 100 % paging failure
    When common LA: 100 % paging success


    Your 90%? Are you sure? My first guess is: voice pages OK, but aggressive retries with SMSes.
    Try to get separate stats for real (voice) MT calls and SMS deliveries.

    BR
    s52d

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •