Thanks Thanks:  2
Showing results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: SFR vs FFR

  1. #1
    Member Reputation: 23
    Join Date
    2011-02-17
    Posts
    59


    Default SFR vs FFR

    Hello,

    Can u pls explain what is the difference between SFR(Soft Freq reuse) & FFR)Fractional FR) , their advantages & why do they have those advantages..?

    Are both used in LTE?

    I would be very grateful...Rep n thanks assured!!

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #2
    Member Reputation: 289
    Join Date
    2010-07-09
    Posts
    206


    Default Re: SFR vs FFR

    Can u pls explain what is the difference between SFR(Soft Freq reuse) & FFR)Fractional FR) , their advantages & why do they have those advantages..?
    the general principle almost the same. to use max bandwidth at near end and 1/3 at far end.
    >FFR was earlier introduced in WiMax.
    >SFR later in LTE.
    advantage
    >to increase capacity/ throughput for near end (by utilizing full bandwidth)
    >to reduce interference at far end (cell edge) by utilizing 1/3 of bandwidth.
    Are both used in LTE?
    SFR>>LTE
    FFR>>WiMax
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by mimoX; 2011-03-10 at 10:38 AM

  4. #3
    Member Reputation: 1068
    Join Date
    2008-08-10
    Posts
    421


    Default Re: SFR vs FFR

    Hi...Both are different
    Similarities

    Separate by the frequency domain / time domain for interference cancellation
    Cell centers use more bandwidth resources, cell edge use of about 1 / 3 frequency bands,
    difference


    FFRuse all the sub-carrier in cell center, SFR use 2/3 sub-carriers


    In DL/UL, FFR same reuse mode,, SFR use different mode

    DL Tx Power: SFR: cell center is lower than cell edge; FFR: cell center is same with cell edge
    UL frequency resource: FFR mode, in cell edge, fixed use 1/3 of the frequency band; In SFR mode, cell edge use partial band, normally near 1/3 of the frequency.




    Last edited by MINTO; 2011-03-09 at 11:00 PM

  5. #4
    Member Reputation: 692
    Join Date
    2010-07-27
    Location
    At your post
    Posts
    196


    Default Re: SFR vs FFR

    FFR 1*3*1
    All BTSs use one frequency point, which on one hand, ensures the coverage and use partial sub-carriers on the cell edge; on the other hand, increases spectrum usage and use all sub-carriers near the BTS.



    Advantages:

    • Use the single frequency point networking, which can implement soft handover.
    • The spectrum efficiency is high, and the sector capacity is large.
    • Subchannel scheduling is flexible. Use excellent sub-channel scheduling mechanism to use frequency resources to the maximum extent.

    Disadvantages:

    • The complex sub-carrier replacement mode and sub-channel scheduling algorithm are hard to implement.
    • The system interference level is related to the quality of the subchannel scheduling algorithm.

    Applicable Scenario:

    • For initial network construction of dense urban areas and areas of middle or high traffic.
    • This networking mode can be used as expansion solution of single frequency point 1*3 reuse mode.
    • This is the preferred networking mode.

    PUSC 1*3*1

    All BTS use one frequency point. Three sectors of a BTS is a reuse cluster. The three sectors use respectively 1/3 sub-channel in a frequency point. The same directional sectors of different BTSs use the same subchannel.


    Advantages:

    • The entire network enjoys co-channel. Soft handover can be implemented.
    • Do not need complex scheduling method of sub-carrier replacement mode. The implementation is easy and the system expense is small.
    • The system interference is small. There is no subchannel conflict between adjacent sectors of a BTS.
    • The coverage range is wide. Cost of initiall network construction is low.
    • Network construction is fast. The interference is easy to be controlled, and the network planning and optimization are simple.

    Disadvantages:

    • The spectrum utilization is low.
    • Network Capacity is small.

    Applicable Scenario:

    • Adapt to initial network construction.
    Last edited by raednoor; 2011-03-10 at 04:34 PM
    Do all the good you can,
    By all the means you can,
    In all the ways you can,
    In all the places you can,
    At all the times you can,
    To all the people you can,
    As long as ever you can.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •