FlexLM.ECC.Generic.Patcher-Flexlm targets (x86/x64 up to version 11.9.x)

As it's using ECC, you'll need to patch pubkey_verify and change the dates in your license.
You won't be able to create a real license unless you replace the public key and that is not trivial.
As it's using flexlm 11.9 the flexlm patcher posted here will most likely work unless they have implemented custom protection on top of that .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tanhieungo

I am new member of this forum . how to know seed ,vendor key ,etc

my Pc only install visual studio 2013 and have flexnet i86_n3-11.9.0


and I have sample other lic

############################################################
# FileId CID_20150330072947210_944017
############################################################
SERVER this_host 40a8f0c9742b
VENDOR scplmd
USE_SERVER
INCREMENT megtracking scplmd 2014.1 23-apr-2015 1 AE383A590A96 \
NOTICE="YOKOGAWA ELECTRIC INTERNATIONAL PTE LTD 1-14S8U4B 1 \
ATS1-M1_S FID_492d4b24_14b4275734d__38bf" START=15-feb-2015 \
SIGN="09B0 B34B 17F6 38CC C5B7 0620 C5ED D6A0 44E6 BF6D FCDA \
5964 D553 2515 256F 0A94 EB4A 130D 6E95 489F C57D A231 FC08 \
5EE9 0191 8210 7DC8 7B0B A056 F13F" SIGN2="1639 6886 5933 669A \
AA42 193B 5CB9 3C2E 5B87 9CE9 3009 F745 E05A 87BE 8DE9 1CE4 \
96C9 405E 4EF2 B1E0 E470 7971 2AB7 9D09 1D41 A3EF EBCA AE9F \
0B42 D6C6"

---

scplmd seed {0x1A3B5C7D, 0x2A4B6C8D}

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kjms

scplmd seed {0x1A3B5C7D, 0x2A4B6C8D}

---

thank very much

but how to know define VENDOR_KEY and TRL key ? can you share tool to generate key

my email tanhieungo@gmail.com

I don't enough reputation so that any one sent direct for me through email

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tanhieungo

thank very much

but how to know define VENDOR_KEY and TRL key ? can you share tool to generate key

my email tanhieungo@gmail.com

I don't enough reputation so that any one sent direct for me through email

---

generated with FlexLm Vendor key generator 3.0 ( It's not hard to find )

/* Version 11 keys */
#define VENDOR_KEY1 0xf5c16523
#define VENDOR_KEY2 0x47da0ba5
#define VENDOR_KEY3 0xd92e32dc
#define VENDOR_KEY4 0xa14a122f
#define VENDOR_KEY5 0x717440c9
#define TRL_KEY1 0xbe114827
#define TRL_KEY2 0xfad76f6f

#define VENDOR_NAME "scplmd"

However, you are still going to have patch ECC.. regardless

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bilbobaggins

generated with FlexLm Vendor key generator 3.0 ( It's not hard to find )

/* Version 11 keys */
#define VENDOR_KEY1 0xf5c16523
#define VENDOR_KEY2 0x47da0ba5
#define VENDOR_KEY3 0xd92e32dc
#define VENDOR_KEY4 0xa14a122f
#define VENDOR_KEY5 0x717440c9
#define TRL_KEY1 0xbe114827
#define TRL_KEY2 0xfad76f6f

#define VENDOR_NAME "scplmd"

However, you are still going to have patch ECC.. regardless

---

thank very much

but I use cmd and to do follow tutorial of darsy but my Pc occur error

Attachment 41309

Hi,
Anybody has the patterns for FlexNet v11.12 x64? Tried different patchers, but didn't work..Thanks

I have found the following pattern:
4C 89 4C 24 20 4C 89 44 24 18 48 89 54 24 10 89..
which is similar to the ones posted in the forum, but not identical.

If I replace in hex with 31 C0 C3 90 90 ....will it work to bypass ECC? Thanks! I am going to try and post my conclusions.

It does not work, program doesn't start. It's working with XF Patcher 64..still testing

Hi!
I feel very confused! Two years ago I worked with the vendor "agilent" FlexLM v.11.11. I found Enc.seeds 1 and 2 (b72966ab, b476c503) and generated license file in FlexLM SDK. All worked fine. And is working now.
Some days ago I tried to repeat that procedure and failed! Can't get the same results as two years ago! Unfortunately I forgot what version of FlexLM SDK I used. Now I use v.11.4 and 11.9, give the same result, but it is incorrect.
For example, I obtain now:
FEATURE Signal_Extractor agilent 1.0 permanent uncounted HOSTID=ANY \
SIGN=F1610FDE9630
but the correct license is:
FEATURE Signal_Extractor agilent 1.0 permanent uncounted HOSTID=ANY \
SIGN=AA766B1A2E6A
Can someone advise me what I'm doing wrong?
Link to vendor daemon: https://mega.nz/#!qawwCALL!aeBEJHBpJ...i0HxbMlIhUgRLc

The code should not be the same. If you generate for example using lmcryptGUI or v 11.9 or v11.4 you will get different codes however all of them should work.