Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
Planing, Atoll is nice and friendly
Drive test, TEMS is good
Processing, actix
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
RF Planning : Atoll : very fast and user firendly
ACP : Capesso from Symena
MW Planning : Pathloss... for the price (very cheap compared to others) ; or Atoll MW module for user-friendly perspective
Drive Test : TEMS without hesitation
Processing : Actix.
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
I agree to most the tools you have mention (actix, map Info, atoll, tems, etc etc), and I know it is not met for the same activities, but not even once Excel was mentioned.
And in my experience you can save a lot of time and work by just a good use of excel and a few lines of VBA.
just saying....
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
for drive test analysis both Actix and Tems investigation.
Tems investigation I find more useful for protocol analysis
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
For DT -NemoA
for Post processing Actix
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
For DT: Tems or Nemo
Planning: Atool
Optimization: schema and optimizer in Neact
Post Processing: Tems Discovery and Actix
Do you know the tool that is use for planning Scrambling code? it must easy to do. just base on distance and relation. I dont like Asset because its hard to do, need digital map, consume more CPU and RAM
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dtvt2
For DT: Tems or Nemo
Planning: Atool
Optimization: schema and optimizer in Neact
Post Processing: Tems Discovery and Actix
Do you know the tool that is use for planning Scrambling code? it must easy to do. just base on distance and relation. I dont like Asset because its hard to do, need digital map, consume more CPU and RAM
Hi dtvt2,
Do you have emu for schema tool, plase share, thanks.
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
Atoll is powerfull and friendly for planing. Google and mapinfo also is addirional support.
Tems, nemo are good for drive test. But xcal support wide devices.
Tems is good for processing. But actix is exclusive for many formats ever.
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
Planning - Atol, Asset
Drive Test - TEMS
Post Processing - Actix