1 Attachment(s)
Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
@ all
to provide the outlook to operators or our members (who are working for operator, and maybe more) the appropriate decisions to select the tools and devices (need to buy, or using in daily RF_working) please share your experience and your point of view in this thread here.
BRs
kamy
let's see a funny picture from a product of Huawei
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
To me Aircomm is very good for planning.
BR.
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
Aircom Asset for planning,
Tems Discovery for Post Processing of DT logs, ACTIX for Post processing of DT logs,
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
I missed the point .....
Post Prossesing Nemo Analizer and for Investigation Nemo Outdoor these are very user friendly.
Attol and Planet are also very good.
BR.
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
Planning - Atol, Asset, Planet
Drive Test - TEMS and Nemo
Post Processing - Actix
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
My choice is Atoll and Actix
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
Planing - Asset
Optimization(paremetric) Schema products
Actix Radioplan - is not effective!
Log analyse - A.Spotlight
TDescovery is so-so..
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
optimization=optimization
dt=tems
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
For Wimax & Lte testing nothing's better than XCAL/ CAP in my opinion..
"luawei technologies"... hehe.. thats a very good one..
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
For Planning - Aircom
DT - TEMS - 2G&3G, XCAL-Wimax
Post Processing - ACtix and TDiscovery
Regards to everybody ;-)