-
1 Attachment(s)
Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
@ all
to provide the outlook to operators or our members (who are working for operator, and maybe more) the appropriate decisions to select the tools and devices (need to buy, or using in daily RF_working) please share your experience and your point of view in this thread here.
BRs
kamy
let's see a funny picture from a product of Huawei
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
To me Aircomm is very good for planning.
BR.
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
Aircom Asset for planning,
Tems Discovery for Post Processing of DT logs, ACTIX for Post processing of DT logs,
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
I missed the point .....
Post Prossesing Nemo Analizer and for Investigation Nemo Outdoor these are very user friendly.
Attol and Planet are also very good.
BR.
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
Planning - Atol, Asset, Planet
Drive Test - TEMS and Nemo
Post Processing - Actix
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
My choice is Atoll and Actix
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
Planing - Asset
Optimization(paremetric) Schema products
Actix Radioplan - is not effective!
Log analyse - A.Spotlight
TDescovery is so-so..
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
optimization=optimization
dt=tems
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
For Wimax & Lte testing nothing's better than XCAL/ CAP in my opinion..
"luawei technologies"... hehe.. thats a very good one..
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
For Planning - Aircom
DT - TEMS - 2G&3G, XCAL-Wimax
Post Processing - ACtix and TDiscovery
Regards to everybody ;-)
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
Planing, Atoll is nice and friendly
Drive test, TEMS is good
Processing, actix
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
RF Planning : Atoll : very fast and user firendly
ACP : Capesso from Symena
MW Planning : Pathloss... for the price (very cheap compared to others) ; or Atoll MW module for user-friendly perspective
Drive Test : TEMS without hesitation
Processing : Actix.
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
I agree to most the tools you have mention (actix, map Info, atoll, tems, etc etc), and I know it is not met for the same activities, but not even once Excel was mentioned.
And in my experience you can save a lot of time and work by just a good use of excel and a few lines of VBA.
just saying....
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
for drive test analysis both Actix and Tems investigation.
Tems investigation I find more useful for protocol analysis
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
For DT -NemoA
for Post processing Actix
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
For DT: Tems or Nemo
Planning: Atool
Optimization: schema and optimizer in Neact
Post Processing: Tems Discovery and Actix
Do you know the tool that is use for planning Scrambling code? it must easy to do. just base on distance and relation. I dont like Asset because its hard to do, need digital map, consume more CPU and RAM
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
Quote:
Originally Posted by
dtvt2
For DT: Tems or Nemo
Planning: Atool
Optimization: schema and optimizer in Neact
Post Processing: Tems Discovery and Actix
Do you know the tool that is use for planning Scrambling code? it must easy to do. just base on distance and relation. I dont like Asset because its hard to do, need digital map, consume more CPU and RAM
Hi dtvt2,
Do you have emu for schema tool, plase share, thanks.
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
Atoll is powerfull and friendly for planing. Google and mapinfo also is addirional support.
Tems, nemo are good for drive test. But xcal support wide devices.
Tems is good for processing. But actix is exclusive for many formats ever.
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
Planning - Atol, Asset
Drive Test - TEMS
Post Processing - Actix
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
Hi abc12ww
- My company has schema and mentor. But license is c2v file. Not emu
-
1 Attachment(s)
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
For Performance monitoring and Processing try EagleEye Tool. it is Free alternative to Aexio Xeus.
you can download it from here:
https://www.facebook.com/EagleEye.Mob.Tool
Attachment 35789
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
Actix and Discovery are very good tools for post processing
and for DT tems are very good
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
Actix and Discovery are very good tools for post processing
and for DT tems are very good
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
If you guys want to find books online Ive always used freebookspot.es
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
i think atoll is the best
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
Does anyone suggest CEM tools
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
Hi
Huawei vs ZTE UE comparison by NSN!
http://www.4shared.com/archive/RQFVXmM2ce/LTE_report_ZTE_VS_HW.html
-
qxdm how connect iphone5s or iphone6 ?
work need know how connect iphone to qxdm,if know pls tell me.thanks
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
Another alternative is Agileto GOLD Edition (freeware) focused on 3G which is covering a lot more topics...
You may get as well the professional version Agileto PRO Edition which is covering all technos (2G/3G/4G) and the most important telecom vendors (Huawei/E*******/Nokia/ALU...). Currently there is a promotion between 1-15 November when you may acquire an Enhanced licence for very affordable rates. Check for details on their promo page (see below):
http://www.agileto.com/promo_page1.html
Agileto PRO Edition has the following main characteristics:
A) Support for all technologies (2G/3G/4G) + main telecom vendors
B) Drive Test + Call Trace Analysis & Optimization
C) KPIs investigation
D) Automatic Network analysis & optimization:
- Output reports & mapping in MapInfo & Google Earth
(Sites & Cells + Neighbors + Drive Test + KPIs)
- OMC Audit & Sanity check verifications
- Inconsistency Cells parameters declarations
- Lack of coverage & quality areas
- Pollution areas
- Overshooters cells
- Cell Coverage areas (Top1 / ASet / Full)
- Missing neighbors (to be added)
- Non useful neighbors (to be deleted)
- Cross sectors / feeders
- Planning errors for 2G(BCCH) / 3G(PSC) / 4G(PCI)
- ‘Border cells’ list (for optimization purposes)
Quote:
Originally Posted by
PaleNxtTel
-
2 Attachment(s)
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
Hi All,
You may process now by Agileto tool the drive test log files from Nemo, TEMS, etc. See the screenshots below:
Attachment 40933
Attachment 40934
For more details check the user guide here:
http://www.agileto.com/docs/Agileto_Help.pdf
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
The efficient and easiest to deal with.
DT - Nemo Outdoor
Post Process - Nemo Analyze
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
TEMS also good. Actix is better for post processing
-
Re: Tools and devices evaluation and comparison, your points of view
DT: TEMS products, Nemo and Romes
Post-Process: TEMS Discovery, Actix, Mapinfo
I think what postprocess tool to use is depending on what DT tool you use.
For TEMS products I think Discovery is the best, but for other tool Actix is the best to use.